Moderna scientists said in a 2021 paper no mRNA jab recipients in the trial had "serious adverse effects." In fact, 14 ultimately did, including three miscarriages. No placebo recipients did.
One maniac could argue: the trial was underpowered.
In reality, after using the killshot on millions of pregnant women, only a few thousands suffered miscarriage.
Therefore, the risk for that bad outcome is small and it's unclear if it was caused by the killshot, and the product is safe to use.
If the proportion 14/550 was applied to 20 million people there would be half a million serious adverse reactions. We know it hasn't happened because the Wikipedia would include that information. It's not there, therefore the killshots are proven safe, again.
And if they are safe, they are also necessary, because no one would invest money to produce a product to prevent a disease that does not exist. That would also be a financial fraud, and probably tax evasion. The CEOs are at large, therefore, there is no fraud either.
Does this sound wrong? Irrational? Insulting?
These tricks is what the FDA has been doing for decades with all drugs, pesticides, herbicides. Everything is declared safe so that you can be a well informed consumer.
I tell people: your tax dollars are being used to lie to you and harm your body, and your daughter's body, and your momma's body, and your dog's body.
But people say "we need the FDA, the problem is that it is corrupt, but someone has to impartially determine if my sunscreen lotion is safe!"
Same reasoning with the EPA, with Public education, with the NIH grants, with everything.
We need government to prevent companies do to us what they are doing to us with the license of the government.
One maniac could argue: the trial was underpowered.
In reality, after using the killshot on millions of pregnant women, only a few thousands suffered miscarriage.
Therefore, the risk for that bad outcome is small and it's unclear if it was caused by the killshot, and the product is safe to use.
If the proportion 14/550 was applied to 20 million people there would be half a million serious adverse reactions. We know it hasn't happened because the Wikipedia would include that information. It's not there, therefore the killshots are proven safe, again.
And if they are safe, they are also necessary, because no one would invest money to produce a product to prevent a disease that does not exist. That would also be a financial fraud, and probably tax evasion. The CEOs are at large, therefore, there is no fraud either.
Does this sound wrong? Irrational? Insulting?
These tricks is what the FDA has been doing for decades with all drugs, pesticides, herbicides. Everything is declared safe so that you can be a well informed consumer.
I tell people: your tax dollars are being used to lie to you and harm your body, and your daughter's body, and your momma's body, and your dog's body.
But people say "we need the FDA, the problem is that it is corrupt, but someone has to impartially determine if my sunscreen lotion is safe!"
Same reasoning with the EPA, with Public education, with the NIH grants, with everything.
We need government to prevent companies do to us what they are doing to us with the license of the government.
As you say: the biggest scam in history.