17 Comments
Mar 23·edited Mar 23Liked by Etienne de la Boetie2

You all might want to look into Amazing Polly (her name is Sherri Nelson) and her husband and who he works for.

I don't trust either Polly or TWC.

https://web.archive.org/web/20131117062452/http://sherrinelson.ca/bio

https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/not-so-amazing-pollys-attack-on-small-business/

https://www.hopegirlblog.com/2024/03/19/full-disclosure-pollys-government-psyop/

Expand full comment
author

I posted Hope Girl's rebuttal to give folks both sides of the story.. still trying to sort everything out myself...

Expand full comment

Why it is not the other way, that S. Nelson is the pseudonym?

In another year on that archived site it is written "Sherri Bones Nelson." Bones sounds like a nym.

Expand full comment

Her real name is not Polly St. George but Sherri Nelson?

Interesting. She said that Polly St. George was her real name when agent Coulson forced her to say her real name instead of using a pseudonym. If you are correct, perhaps he knew that?

She always had in her videos that painting of Saint George stepping on a dragon.

Expand full comment

There are many issues with her and her personality - and her husband; she's part of the system like Icke, Alex Jones to name but two.

Expand full comment

What do you think of Professor Tom Cowan?

Expand full comment

Maybe you're right.

I'm more doubtful about her "personality." She's aggressive, I've noticed, and I like it. FOr the kind of analyses she presents to the public, aggressivity is a good trait, not a discrediting trait.

It's bad to combine aggressivity with exaggeration. That's a trademark of major charlatans, on any topic.

Expand full comment

I need to correct my comment.

I've seen the video again. Polly does not say that's her name. Another commenter "gardenvarietyhumans" writes "her name is on her website," which the host Jim reads, and then Coulson says "her name is really Polly St. George? really? Oh, OK"

I misunderstood this part. She doesn't say it is her real name. She says she uses a pseudonym because she's had stalkers.

https://rumble.com/v4befe6-version-with-chat-replay-we-llness-comp-any-owner-lies-deflects-and-attacks.html go to 01:04:40

Expand full comment

The Highwire is a huge Gatekeeper

The Virus theory is rotting on the vine. Reasonable people are rightfully rejecting virology as the pseudo-science it's always been. This has the potential of being a GREAT AWAKENING to liberate us from the poison needle and abolish the vaccine-industrial-complex forever. So, I'm one of a growing "many" who are becoming suspicious of groups that fail to question or comment about the possibility there are serious problems with the virus theory. The Highwire has proven to be the most visible Gatekeeper in serious violation of scientific curiosity. They never discuss the issue or invite any of the numerous Terrain practitioners as guests on the show. Dr. Andrew Kaufman appeared 3.5 years ago and was never invited back. So, the Gatekeeper club has become a palpable reality and a destructive influence in the Medical Truth community. Alternative media is supposed to be a place where we question science and allow discussion, but Del Bigtree has an authoritarian bias that disallows even questioning whether virology could be a failed theory or not. It's always 100% crickets. As a result, the Highwire is becoming irrelevant with nothing new to contribute. In a recent example, Bigtree attended a Los Angeles 'Medical Freedom Symposium" on 2/12/2024, hosted by Terrain practitioner, Dr Robert O. Young. The trip was presumably financed by Highwire member contributions however Bigtree never told his contributors that he attended on their dime, probably because it was tainted by a Virus Denier, Dr, Robert O. Young. So why did Bigtree sneak to the meeting and not report what happened? - Here;s the event announcement - https://groups.google.com/g/town-square-news/c/kRww-RYlY2c/m/i5LGzF8RAwAJ

Expand full comment
deletedMar 8
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

They are different. The thing about flat earth is that our intuition tells us that the earth is endless, only the seas are greater. And it seems that the Sun and the Moon move around the Earth. The easy thing to do is to follow intuition, and imagine that the Earth is at the center of everything, and then declare that our imagination coincides exactly with reality.

But the Earth is round, an ellipsoid actually, and there were difficult proofs of this in the past, and photographic evidence in modern times.

So, the FE wants people to follow intuition and imagination and intellectual arrogance instead of science.

But the no virus thing actually attacks intuition.

We've been told many times that the natural phenomenon of contagious disease is caused by germs, viruses among them. There ought to be proof for that claim, right?

This belief has been etched so deep in our thinking that I've found people actually arguing that it is intuitively true that viruses cause infections. You can actually see it! You have here this person who is sick, and this other person is not sick, and you can see, like actress Greta seeing CO2 molecules in the air, that a virus (only one virion is necessary) has jumped, like a tick, from the sick person to the not-sick person, and now this second person is sick, even though she's not sick, because she has "the virus" now, and if you wait a few days, you and your imagination will confirm that she is sick from a viral infection that you saw happening, even though she is fine and she was fine all the time after she was next to the sick person. Which is crazy, of course.

This is "intuition talking turkey."

Then comes the scientific attitude, which is what the no virus people are pushing.

They defend the scientific method, the gall of these people!

They say that the viral hypothesis is falsable. Experiments have been done. They disprove the hypothesis. No virus has ever been shown to cause disease, and no virus has ever been shown to exist. It is institutionalized imagination, and science rescues imagination from involuntary institutional commitment.

To sum it up: Flat earth movement tells you to follow intuition and disregard scientific evidence and logic. The no-virus people tells you to question your intuition, because it may not be intuition at all, and to question your own beliefs using logic and evidence instead of opinion and fallacies. Very different in my view.

And yes, it's very difficult to believe that so many people can be wrong, or mind-controlled if you allow the exaggeration.

And for such a long time.

It's incredible. But virology is not a science. That's the truth, and it hurts.

Among other things, it hurts because a falsification of science is being used to pass legislation that makes your daily life very uncomfortable. And it also makes your poorer. And if you are not a psychopath, you see parents abusing their kids with masks and needles, and you will suffer watching that more if you accept that the premise is false. This is a very harsh reality. I understand your resistance because I've been there.

Please, forgive the online abuse and zealotry of my fellow no-virus anonymous commenters. That's not the way.

And if you have proof that viruses exist and are pathogenic, please report your evidence. We are all waiting to see it.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/BNF8bZXvxS3f/

https://drtomcowan.com/pages/the-virus-challenge

Expand full comment

No it's not. The virus lie is confirmed in provable failure to isolate, purify and characterize. This is the one issue that separates the red from blue pill organizations. it's the benchmark for determining which movement and organizations are valid or complicit. Bigtree and McCullough are 2 of the biggest certified rats -- Recent post - https://tinyurl.com/tz35y6hz

Expand full comment
deletedMar 8
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Reuters is fact-checker disinfo lies. You'll never understand anything by taking their word for it. You should know that by now. This is what you want - https://tinyurl.com/tz35y6hz

Expand full comment

This saga is very formative.

I observe in awe how for many people, left and right, everything is a conspiracy except real conspiracies.

Polly St. George is an amazing researcher and speaker. I think she's better than James Corbett. He's more journalist/historian, but she's more of a philosopher. Real philosophers dare to say things the historians and journalists keep quiet.

It would be funny if Polly ends up debunking Michael Malice some sunny day.

Expand full comment

You need to look into her and her husband. See my comment further up in the thread.

Expand full comment
deletedMar 8
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

The thing about people of German ancestry, like many Mormons, is that... well... Germans like warfare, and there is no warfare without spies, and extortion, and impossible tales, and blackmail. They kinda like the dark arts, right?

Expand full comment
deletedMar 8
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

First, I wrote "many Mormons" not "all Mormons" or "most Mormons." I was careful.

Second, of course Germans like to "invade" Denmark and Sweden Holland and old Hibernia, and the Royal family of the other island (the bad island, IMO) are actually Germans, and Japan likes Germany too, always was that way (in the 19th century, when the European took over China, the Japanese liked the idea of conquering continental land and genocide the people there, and they had an alliance with the European powers,) and Mexico is a huge country and there are many people there.

No real Mexican was ever isolated and purified, bro!

I didn't say that Germans are violent. I said they like warfare. War is the industry of industries and requires much mental power and concentration, sometimes even concentration camps. And Germans like being industrious like that.

War is also the art of lies, and lying in general is a proof of intense mental activity, which is one of the pleasures of this life.

It's very common. Not all Germans are into that, but it's common. Germans are just humans. They like the same as everyone else. But they are stubborn. They are constant. Everything requires work for them. They think in transactional terms often, even when that's not convenient.

Do you know about Goethe's stories and poems? Pretty scary old stuff.

Have you watched James Lindsey video about Hegel and the very traditional occult practices in certain parts of Germany? It's a fun thought to entertain. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uf4R0gX7g3w

I think Lindsay is a recovering Rothbardian or something like that. Strangely, ex-libertarians hate him. Which proves that sacred libertarian doctrine does not make people anti-social jerks, but that anti-social jerks feel attracted to libertarian doctrine, only to realize that is also not their place in the world. Ex-libertarians are migratory, but libertarians are homebodies.

And the Aztecs sucked very much. Yes. Everyone agrees on that.

Expand full comment