Congress is presumably made up of many factions, and thereby some fairness of outcome will occur after any enquiry into whichever events are examined and, for the FBI to withhold the whistler blowers revelations (because it might hurt some others mentioned) is not good enough...if that be considered the case, then would it not be intelligent to have a member of the FBI with suitable skills involved in the paths taken by the debate about the info given AND, if oaths still apply let all of them vow not to disclose anything that would harm innocents named in the disclosures...it is not for the FBI to be able to decide what the public should or should not be told...that is no-ones business...truth needs to be seen and heard.
Congress is presumably made up of many factions, and thereby some fairness of outcome will occur after any enquiry into whichever events are examined and, for the FBI to withhold the whistler blowers revelations (because it might hurt some others mentioned) is not good enough...if that be considered the case, then would it not be intelligent to have a member of the FBI with suitable skills involved in the paths taken by the debate about the info given AND, if oaths still apply let all of them vow not to disclose anything that would harm innocents named in the disclosures...it is not for the FBI to be able to decide what the public should or should not be told...that is no-ones business...truth needs to be seen and heard.