Best way to cancel people this days is using the word antisemitism, and just because her last name is Jewish, that is it, it is settle , he looses and without any proof we support the person behind the last name
She should be suing Fox's CEOs...it's always the bosses who set the ethical tone of any given company. she should also be suing the people whom she physically worked with in combination with the bosses, Tucker could be included if she perceived him as 'aiding and abetting' the perpetrators of her alleged abusers...who are presumed innocent until proven guilty if one is to apply the law correctly.
I suppose it feels less scary to tackle someone smaller than Fox itself...the cost of lawyers by itself would be overwhelming.
Sadly the interview with that woman suing Carlson isn't in-depth enough for one to ascertain if she is justified in suing or has jumped onto the 'woke sensitivity wagon' to gain footage?
How do you make someone's life a judicially actionable living hell if you are hundreds of miles away? If it was that bad, why didn't she quit? I could support fighting a groper or a bathroom rapist or someone who didn't hesitate to be verbally or physically abusive during in person settings.
Best way to cancel people this days is using the word antisemitism, and just because her last name is Jewish, that is it, it is settle , he looses and without any proof we support the person behind the last name
She should be suing Fox's CEOs...it's always the bosses who set the ethical tone of any given company. she should also be suing the people whom she physically worked with in combination with the bosses, Tucker could be included if she perceived him as 'aiding and abetting' the perpetrators of her alleged abusers...who are presumed innocent until proven guilty if one is to apply the law correctly.
I suppose it feels less scary to tackle someone smaller than Fox itself...the cost of lawyers by itself would be overwhelming.
Sadly the interview with that woman suing Carlson isn't in-depth enough for one to ascertain if she is justified in suing or has jumped onto the 'woke sensitivity wagon' to gain footage?
How do you make someone's life a judicially actionable living hell if you are hundreds of miles away? If it was that bad, why didn't she quit? I could support fighting a groper or a bathroom rapist or someone who didn't hesitate to be verbally or physically abusive during in person settings.
But this? It reeks of an Assange strategy...