Discover more from Scientific Progress
The REAL Vivek RamaSWAMPY
NOTHING is what it seems. Another WEF-puppetician?
"All that glitters is not gold"
In order to understand the context of this article, first find the evidence about the 2020 American Coup:
Career with a conscience?
In Harvard College, Vivek was member of Phi Beta Kappa: it’s like a pre-mason organization without the satanic passage rituals (just as Rotary or Lion’s Club).
Intern for mason company Goldman Sachs.
In 2011, the Paul & Daisy Soros Fellowships for New Americans awarded Ramaswamy a post-graduate fellowship.1
“As fund manager, invested in Martin Shkreli's company Retrophin, which bought drug patents/licenses for rare diseases, just to rise the price: “Thiola being marked up about 20x, from $1.50 to $30 per pill (patients must take 10 to 15 pills a day) and Chenodal 5x.” Shkreli was condemned for fraud (7 years in prison) and $72 million in fines. In a 2023 speech and in his book Woke Inc., Ramaswamy called Shkreli both "brilliant" and a pathological liar, but criticized the U.S. Department of Justice for prosecuting him, calling Shkreli's fraud “victimless”, in spite of not paying debts for over 10 million dollars (Lehman, Merrill Lynch2).”3
Vivek made dozens of millions, yet investors and pension funds lost 3 billion from his self-promoted Axovant company, which didn’t deliver a single drug to the market, in spite of his grandiose promises.
Vivek made SoftBank lose 1 billion in his company ROIvant, which never became profitable. Is he an entrepreneur or a legal conman? Why did he study law after biology?: he failed in business, but was able to make near 1 billion milked from institutional investors or masonic fund-managers under orders, who lost at least 4 billion. Bad, but “not bad” (for him). What kind of magician is this? for every 4 bucks, 3 disappear but 1 appears in his pocket. 100% unethical but 100% legal in the USA. Yet, the dollars belonged to real people, like the California State Teachers' Retirement System pension fund.
“An entrepreneur is the one who always searches for change, responds to it and exploits it as an opportunity”. That definition is immoral. Innovation is not equal to entrepreneurship. Would we call a drug-cartel gangster an entrepreneur because he came up with a submarine to smuggle drugs to the USA? Innovation is not equal to entrepreneurship.
Schumpeter advocated for creative-destruction in Capitalism as a positive result because the recombination of factors of production achieved a higher productivity/profit than in the previous stage, benefiting the common good. It is unethical to have profits by exploiting any stake-holder in the new venture, even if it is an investor (especially, if using the worker’s money through funds) or a consumer (especially, the very-sick).
Would Vivek call a haccine-developer an entrepreneur, in spite of making millions out of millions of lives lost, by being protected by legal immunity? Would he be a hypocrite if he didn’t? Some argue that he had no scruples on making billions by:
1. Extorting rare-disease patients by taking advantage of an unfair legal monopolistic protection granted by masonic patent laws which allow the “pay the overprice or die”.
2. Fleecing the investors by being smart to create legal traps to enrich himself in spite of (or because of) everyone else’s misery. In any venture, there’s a risk of failure, but it’s unethical that the entrepreneur walks away filthy rich in spite of it.
He served on the Ohio COVID-19 Response Team, which promoted hackswabbing, lockdowns, masks, haccines, etc. Vivek paid a wikipedia editor to remove this and his Soros connection.4
Despite his anti-woke sweet-talking, in 2020, he promoted “health equity and diversity within the biopharma and biotech industries”, through Roivant Social Ventures.5 Health equity “arises from access to the social determinants of health, specifically from wealth, power and prestige”6 and is “the state in which everyone has a fair and just opportunity to attain their highest level of health”7: in 2 words, health socialism (white communism).
“Diversity” means another woke ideology: gender ideology (pink and rainbow communism).
He’s not fully pro-life, i.e. from conception to natural death: “He supports state-level six-week abortion bans, with exceptions for rape, incest, and danger to the woman's life, but opposes a federal ban.”8
The latter is a tricky catch-phrase: in case of danger to a woman’s life no one is against trying to save both lives, it’s not procured abortion and therefore, not criminalized anywhere in the world.
In the case of rape, why does the innocent child (with 50% of the mothers’ genes) has to be another victim and condemned to death, instead of punishing the rapist? Why not adoption?
The case for incest means being in favor of eugenics by assuming higher chances of disabilities due to in-breeding. Precisely, this utilitarian and Darwinian mindset is behind the massive (95%) global extermination plan, dearly held by the secret global government, clearly proven by the weaponization of medicine and pharma since 1910.
He wrote an op-ed in the Boston Globe about Human-Chimeras: "One should treat a recipient of transferred humanity with the same level of respect as an organism with inborn humanity".
He believes the anti-science ideologies that burning fossil fuels causes global warming and in “climate change mitigation” (green communism).
“He supports the #Modi govt, and Hindu supremacist organizations. How can he ask for Christian votes while enabling the slaughter of Christians in India?”
WEF: it’s complicated !
Vivek was mentioned as a Young Global Leader in many pages of the masonic World Economic Forum. After years, he “sued” them for including him in the precious list, and twitted this WEF answer: 9
Why is it fake?
1. The logo is not the one of the WEF: the font is different and it lacks the semi-circle
2. It’s not even folded. It doesn’t have any marks of handling. It was not mailed: just printed in his office?
3. It has no legal value: no date, no signature, no contact information.
Compare with this real letter from the WEF (which proves it controls governments!):
Finally, it doesn’t say that he didn’t belong to the Young Global Leaders program: it only says that he was promoted without his consent after a certain date (not before, when they did have his consent?).
13 reasons why … NOT Vivek 10
1. Vivek Criticism on Trump re J6: “What Trump did last week was wrong. Downright abhorrent. Plain and simple. I’ve said it before and did so in my piece.” 11
2. Vivek Criticism on Trump re J6: “Both are terrifying. Unfortunately Trump’s egregious behavior last week blinds us from seeing that Big Tech’s cure is worse. Makes for a winning game for China in the long run.” 12
3. Vivek Praised Snapchat for Banning Trump 13
4. Vivek was a Soros Fellow 14
5. Vivek praised George Soros “Well said George Soros I consider Mr. Xi the most dangerous enemy of open societies in the world.” 15
6. Vivek says All Americans are responsible for J6 16
7. Viveks Company Roivant highlighted by Soros Fellowship & Vivek as a very friendly Tweet 17
8. Vivek Company Roivant Linked to the CCP In 2018, Vivek's company Roivant partnered with a Chinese asset management company to back a Chinese company named Sinovant. Sinovant then formed a partnership with a CCP-linked non-profit managed by the CCP's Ministry of Civil Affairs of China. 18
9. Was Roivant involved in creating the Covid-19 vaccine? Roivant Sciences’ Genevant Sciences and Arbutus are suing Pfizer with a lawsuit alleging that Pfizer infringed on their lipid nanoparticle technology to create the Covid-19 vaccine Comirnaty. 19
10. In 2020, Vivek said mask wearing is a personal responsibility & was very condescending to conservatives. “Wearing a mask = personal responsibility. It’s puzzling when conservatives oppose it. But before deriding them, remember this: CDC and WHO discouraged wearing masks in March - a “noble lie” to save masks for healthcare workers. Institutional lying erodes public trust in science.” 20
11. Vivek owns a BLACKROCK aggressive growth portfolio for his child worth up to $250,000. Vivek's "Ramaswamy Trust" owns up to 5 million dollars of a BLACKROCK Equity Fund. 21
12. In 2021, Vivek said "we should aim to safely vaccinate everyone who is eligible." Does Roivant have a deal with Pfizer? 22
13. Vivek called on other candidates to Pardon Trump (as if he was guilty of anything). 23
Vivek for Trump?
Vivek even legally supported Trump against his J6 indictment, but just as DeSantis24, still says the elections were not stolen and that J6 was a real insurrection:
“I just filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Justice following its failure to substantively respond to my Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to uncover what White House officials including President Joe Biden communicated to Merrick Garland & Jack Smith about the unprecedented indictment in the classified documents case of a former U.S. President and one of Biden's political opponents in the 2024 Presidential election. I’m also filing a separate FOIA request with the DOJ to uncover any similar communications relating to the just-issued Jan 6 Trump indictment. We should demand accountability and transparency.
In U.S. v. Alvarez, the Supreme Court held that political candidates have a First Amendment right to knowingly make inaccurate statements. If you're going to indict a former president and leading presidential candidate, it better not be based on unprecedented legal theory. Further, it's more than a stretch to call something criminal if someone is seeking legal counsel from their own lawyers.
Jack Smith has created a dangerous precedent by criminalizing the behavior of Trump's lawyers who offered him legal advice, labeling them co-conspirators instead. This jeopardizes the future of our legal system. If we fail to admit the truth, Jan 6 will just be a preview of far worse to come. We must reunite this country, but the path forward will not be easy.” 25
Why did he say that last part? “Donald Trump isn’t the cause of what happened on Jan 6. The real cause was systematic & pervasive censorship of citizens in the year leading up to it. If you tell people they can’t speak, that’s when they scream. If you tell people they can’t scream, that’s when they tear things down.” 26
What censorship is he talking about? The COVID gain of function at Wuhan paid by US taxpayers? The 30+ cures for COVID? The injuring lockdowns? The haccines? The stolen elections? No! Vivek only blamed how the FBI and Big Tech colluded to censor the Hunter Biden laptop story. 27
Out of the 6 co-conspirators, why did Vivek only defend the attorneys and not the rest who were also innocent? 28
Is Vivek even eligible to become P or VP?
Having in mind that Obama was imposed as President in spite of not having an undoctored US birth certificate and therefore all his acts of government were void:
“Vivek states his parents came to the US in 1983 (his parents have also made this statement) and that Vivek was born in 1985. When an immigrant comes to the US legally there is a process to become a US citizen. First they must establish permanent residency. To apply for US citizenship you must be a permanent resident of the United States for 5 years. So if Vivek’s parents came here in 1983 and Vivek was born in 1985 it is a pretty accurate assumption to say his parents were not citizens when Vivek was born. This would make Vivek an anchor baby and anchor babies cannot ever be natural born citizens. Again, there is a difference between a citizen, naturalized citizen and a natural born citizen. Ramaswamy, Shiva, Haley are 3 candidates running for President that are not eligible to run for President or to be VP. And Kamala Harris, running as VP under Joe Biden, is also not a natural born citizen. Proving these 4 people are not natural born citizens is very simple. No matter what has happened in the past is no reason to continue to allow our Constitution to be violated.
Both of Kamala's parents were foreigners in the US on temporary student visas when she was born. This makes her an anchor baby and an anchor baby is not natural born. Her father never did become a US citizen and her mother did not become a citizen until much later in life. DACAs are not natural born citizens.” Source:
Was Vivek describing himself when he said: “Politicians are like flags: they look good but just wave in whatever direction the breeze is blowing.” ? 29
Vivek first thought running as Senator, then as presidential candidate. He publicly attacks DeSantis while supporting Trump, without any criticism whatsoever.
What are his motives? Instead of a sure place as Senator, why would Vivek, with nearly a billion dollars to enjoy life, spend 10 million of his own money in his own campaign, knowing beforehand that he has no chance whatsoever to win against Trump ... and even if Trump is ousted, Vivek, having zero political experience, he has near-zero chances against a proven Governor like DeSantis (unless election rigging again).
Some argue that he’s just an idiot deceiving himself he has a chance to be President to the point of wasting 10 million of his own not-hard-earned masonic money in his inflated ego. It’s clear that is not the case, considering he showed he was pretty clever to scam so many in his business. A scammer is always a scammer: he’s just changing fields from business to politics.
Vivek is all about selling “hope” to the gullible voters, especially those tired of the “establishment”, ignoring that he is just another sweet-talking swamp-Trojan. Vivek knows he makes promises that he can’t keep:
“supports expanding presidential power, pledging to rule by executive fiat to a degree unprecedented among modern U.S. presidents. He supports abolishing the Department of Education, FBI, and IRS. He asserts that the president has the unilateral power to abolish these agencies by executive order, although under the Constitution, Congress has the power of the purse. He has pledged to fire "at least half the federal workforce" and dismantle federal civil service protections, turning federal jobs into at-will jobs. He has called for an eight-year term for all government employees and pledged to revoke the executive order issued by President Kennedy that gave federal employees a right to collectively bargain. He also has proposed repealing the federal law that requires presidents to spend all the money Congress appropriates. Favors raising the voting age to 25 in most circumstances.”31
He is clueless on how he will achieve all that. In his website, he’s got no government plan. Zero. He’s 100% chit chat. His job is to be a mermaid: to enchant the voters and use them.
Why was Vivek getting “free-microphones” from mason dominant media? Why him? A nobody in politics!
Masons know he’ll never win, but expect Trump to add him in his cabinet or as VP. They’ve done exactly the same infiltration tactics in other countries. 30 They possibly did it with Mike Pence. They need someone as VP to backstab Trump or to replace him, in case they fail with lawfare or assassination, or in case of natural death.
To err is human, to apologize, humane, to pardon, divine. As of August 2023, Vivek never clarified or apologized for anything denounced here.
His only values are his valuables?
based on Ron Watkins’ research:
21 Vivek's financial disclosure https://documentcloud.org/documents/23868805-vivek-ramaswamy-disclosure-report-7-6-23
30 E.g. mason Sergio Massa in Argentina.