U.S. Appellate Court Blocks Injunction Against Federal Agencies Acting to Censor Free Speech

In a March 2023 press release explaining why the lawsuit requesting an injunction against federal government officials was important, Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey stated:

by Carolyn Hendler

Freedom of speech in the United States was delivered a blow on July 14, 2023 when a U.S. Federal Appeals Court issued a temporary stay blocking a preliminary injunction which limited the U.S. Justice Department’s communication with social media companies seeking to remove “content containing protected free speech.” The Appellate Court panel of Judges, Judge Carl Stewart (appointed by President Bill Clinton), Judge James Graves (appointed by President Barack Obama) and Judge Andrew Oldham (appointed by President Donald Trump) did not issue an explanation for their decision in the government’s favor.^{1 2}

The original lawsuit was brought by Former Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt and Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry against 67 U.S. federal agencies. The lawsuit accused government officials of engaging in a widespread campaign of pressuring and colluding with social media platforms to censor users’ free speech in violation of the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Plaintiffs submitted more than 1,400 pieces of information taken from internal government documents to support their request for a preliminary injunction, which was granted on July 4 by US District Judge Terry Doughty in Louisiana.^{3 4}

In a March 2023 press release explaining why the lawsuit requesting an injunction against federal government officials was important, Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey stated:

The motion for preliminary injunction highlights 1,432 facts showing that top officials in the federal government are coercing and colluding with big tech social media companies to censor free speech… This case is the most important free speech lawsuit in a generation, as we highlight more than 1,400 facts showing the Biden Administration’s blatant coercion and collusion with Big Tech social media companies to suppress speech it disagrees with. I will not rest until the court blocks unelected bureaucrats from violating our constitutional right to free and open debate.⁵

The preliminary injunction prohibited the federal agencies and officials from engaging in discourse with social media companies that amounted to, “encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech.”⁸

 Justice Department Requests a Stay and Files an Appeal

The Justice Department requested a stay of the court order pending an appeal, but Judge Doughty declined the motion on July 10. Having lost their bid with Judge Doughty, the Justice Department turned to the 5^th Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans requesting an emergency stay, which was granted four days later.^{9 10}

The Justice Department’s 22- page request resulted in the Appellate Court agreeing to temporarily block the preliminary injunction pending appeal and expedite the matter. The lengthy request for a stay suggests that the Justice Department is considering bringing the matter to the U.S. Supreme Court, if necessary.^{11 12}

The Justice Department’s filing complained that the injunction had the potential to prevent the government from protecting the public from misinformation about natural disasters, the fentanyl crisis and the security of national elections.¹³

The Emergency Appeal argues, in part, that Judge Doughty’s ruling was over-reaching and overly broad, would irreparably harm the government and that the plaintiffs lacked standing to bring suit against the federal government under the parens patrai theory.¹⁴ The parens patrai theory states that a state may act as a third party to bring a lawsuit that involves the state’s quasi-sovereign interests in order to protect its citizens.¹⁵

Government Officials Deny Coercing Social Media Companies to Censor Citizens

The Government argues that the plaintiffs are not likely to succeed on the First Amendment claim because, “…government officials do not violate the First Amendment when they request that a private intermediary not carry a third party’s speech so long as the officials do not threaten adverse consequences if the intermediary refuses to comply.”¹⁶

Judge Doughty disagreed. In his 155-page decision granting a preliminary injunction, he concluded that the Plaintiffs were likely to succeed on the merit as the government’s actions towards social media companies went beyond mere requests and instead amounted to pressure and “significant encouragement” to remove and suppress free speech to the extent that the social media companies removal and flagging of content was deemed an extension of government action, which violates the First Amendment.

---

Go paid at the $5 a month level, and we will send you both the PDF and e-Pub versions of “Government” - The Biggest Scam in History… Exposed! and a coupon code for 10% off anything in the Government-Scam.com/Store.

Go paid at the $50 a year level, and we will send you a free paperback edition of Etienne’s book “Government” - The Biggest Scam in History… Exposed! AND a 64GB Liberator flash drive if you live in the US. If you are international, we will give you a $10 credit towards shipping if you agree to pay the remainder.

Support us at the $250 Founding Member Level and get an Everything Bundle – The Sampler of Liberty! - Get it free by going paid as a Founding Member!

Give me Liberty... and give me more! The Everything Bundle includes the latest version of our flagship book on government, along with a collection of potentially life-altering introductions to voluntaryism, agorism and peaceful anarchy.

• “Government” – The Biggest Scam in History… Exposed! by Etienne de la Boetie2

• Anarchy Exposed! - A former police officer reports on his investigative journeyby Shepard the Voluntaryist and Larken Rose

• The Most Dangerous Superstition by Larken Rose

• Sedition, Subversion and Sabotage – Field Manual #1 by Ben Stone, The Bad Quaker, and Ken Yamarashi

• What Anarchy Isn’t– A short pamphlet by Larken Rose… The perfect introduction to peaceful anarchy

• Three Friends Free – A Children’s Story of Voluntaryism

• The Liberator is a 64GB wafer flash drive filled with books, documentaries, podcasts, MP3s, short videos, and music from the truth movement’s leading artists.  The credit card-sized format makes it convenient to keep in your wallet to share and copy easily.