UPDATE: Medicare freeze beneficiary secretly donates $2.5 million to Trump ballroom
Etienne Note: This article also appears in “Government”, Media and Academia Criminality Exposed, A digest of HUNDREDS and HUNDREDS of articles exposing and suggesting inter-generational organized crime’s control of the “Government,” Media and Academia by the Art of Liberty Foundation. You can view the other articles or subscribe on Telegram: https://t.me/Government_Scams

Earlier this year, Popular Information broke the news that Extremity Care – a company that sells bandages to Medicare for thousands of dollars per square inch – donated $5 million to MAGA Inc., President Trump’s super PAC, on February 24. Six days later, Trump blasted a pending Biden administration rule that would have barred Medicare from covering Extremity Care’s products.
The Biden rule was initially scheduled to take effect in February 2025, but was delayed by the Trump administration until April 13 as part of a blanket regulatory freeze. On April 11, 40 days after Trump’s post, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) announced the rule would be delayed until at least January 1, 2026, allowing Extremity Care to continue charging Medicare for its products.
As that deadline approaches, Extremity Care has secretly donated $2.5 million toward the construction of a new White House ballroom, a top priority for Trump. The White House publicly released a list of donors last month, but Extremity Care was not included. According to The New York Times, the company was permitted to donate anonymously.
CMS, in preparation for implementing the Biden rule, determined that 17 skin substitute products have proven their effectiveness in scientifically valid studies. The agency found that Extremity Care products lack scientific backing. One of Extremity Care’s products, Coll-e-Derm, costs $11,051.10 per square inch. Another Extremity Care product, CompleteFT, costs $7,812.38 per square inch.
Skin substitute products went from a negligible source of Medicare spending in 2014 to $256 million in 2019, and then surged to more than $10 billion in 2024. As a result of the Trump administration’s delay of the rule, Medicare spending on skin substitutes “is projected to reach $15.4 billion by the end of 2025.”
“The deliberate misuse of skin substitutes is endangering America’s seniors and pricing schemes are undermining the integrity and the long-term sustainability of Medicare,” said Emily Brower, CEO of the National Association of Accountable Care Organizations. “If we are truly committed to combating fraud, waste, and abuse, we must put an end to this exploitation by bad actors.”
Many of the products with scientific backing are much less expensive than those offered by Extremity Care. Oasis wound matrix, a product that has proved effective in scientific research, charges Medicare $75.51 per square inch. Another scientifically proven product, Apligraf, charges $195.58 per square inch.
On July 14, the Trump administration announced a new proposed Medicare rule for skin substitutes. The new proposal would cap payments for skin substitutes at $806 per square inch. This is lower than what many companies, including Extremity Care and Legacy, currently charge, but it would not limit coverage to products that are scientifically proven to be effective. Further, many of those proven products are available for far less than $806 per square inch.
The Medicare Access to Skin Substitutes Coalition (MASS Coalition), which represents Extremity Care and others in the industry, also opposes the new rule. In a September 12 letter to CMS, the MASS Coalition claims that $806 per square inch “does not cover the many costs incurred by manufacturers to deliver these products to providers who administer them to patients.” They suggest that if the rule goes into effect, manufacturers may stop selling their products, and “access to these critical treatments will be seriously compromised.” Instead, the industry is proposing a payment cap as high as $6,277.41 per square inch, plus additional payments for “innovative” products.
They cite a paper by Dr. William Tettelbach and published in the Journal of Wound Care, which recommends a reimbursement cap of $3,083.86 to $4,541.93 per square inch. The letter does not mention that Tettlebach has been paid by Extremity Care, a subsidiary of Tiger BioSciences, to conduct research.
In addition to writing the letter, the skin substitute industry has had an opportunity to press their case with the Trump administration in person. On October 21, Extremity Care CEO Oliver Burckhardt attended an exclusive dinner with Trump for top donors on the Rose Garden patio.
The Best “Go Paid” Deal on Substack! You Get REAL Stuff!!
Go paid at the $5 a month level, and we will send you both the PDF and e-Pub versions of Etienne’s new book: To See the Cage Is to Leave It - 25 Techniques the Few Use to Control the Many and a coupon code for 10% off anything in the https://artofliberty.org/store/.
Go paid at the $50 a year level, and we will send you a free paperback edition of Etienne’s new book: To See the Cage Is to Leave It - 25 Techniques the Few Use to Control the Many OR “Government” - The Biggest Scam in History… Exposed! OR a 64GB Liberator flash drive if you live in the US. If you are international, we will give you a $10 credit towards shipping if you agree to pay the remainder.
Support us at the $250 Founding Member Level and get a signed high-resolution hardcover of “Government” - The Biggest Scam in History... Exposed! + Liberator flash drive + a signed high-resolution hardcover of Etienne’s new book: To See the Cage Is to Leave It - 25 Techniques the Few Use to Control the Many + everything else in our “Everything Bundle” of the best in voluntaryist thought delivered domestically. International pays shipping. Our only option for signed copies besides catching Etienne @ an event.





Is there really a high demand for "skin substitutes", other than for burn victims? Isn't placental tissue the best "skin substitute" for treating burn victims?
Details aside... We the People are getting tired of those who volunteered to become public servants, - whether elected, appointed, or hired - abusing the public trust and / or the authority delegated to the position in which they serve.
U.S. Constitution - Article VI, Clause 2. & 3.
"'This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof;
and Treaties made, or which shall be made under [not above, nor beyond] the authority of the United States' shall be the supreme Law of the Land;
and the Judges in every State shall be BOUND thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding."
The Senator and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers both of the United State and of the several States, shall be BOUND by Oath or Affirmation to support this Constitution..."
Those who volunteer to become servants of the People in State or local government positions are also required to take an Oath of Affirmation to their State constitution, as well.
S.C. U.S. Justice, in Colten vs. Commonwealth of Ky. wrote: "The constitutional principle is that we the people are the sovereigns, the state and federal officials only our agents."