There Was No SARS Cov2 Disease, Just A Set of Symptoms and a Branding Campaign – Dr David Martin
Discover more from The Daily News from the Art of Liberty Foundation
There Was No SARS Cov2 Disease, Just A Set of Symptoms and a Branding Campaign – Dr David Martin
Therefore, Martin’s theory has potentially weakened the unity and divided the truth movement. Now it appears that Dr Martin
Dr. David Martin has been championed as a guy who has shown proof that “SARS was research developed by humans in the lab at the University of North Carolina and then weaponised and released to attack humans.” Now though, he has said that there is “no disease it was a set of symptoms and a branding campaign” Simplified he says, it is a fake virus that was merely used to convince many people to get injected.
“They said (the perpetrators) they were going to make an event where the media hype would drive the public to demand a medical countermeasure called a vaccine, so for that the unambiguous nature of what this is, it was domestic and international terrorism it was collusion it was racketeering.” Says Martin.
Unfortunately, much of the health freedom movement have used his previous statements of an intentional “release” to lend credence to the lab-made virus idea, an idea that has caused many an argument against those who have never believed in its existence.
Therefore, Martin’s theory has potentially weakened the unity and divided the truth movement. Now it appears that Dr Martin, who at the very least insinuated there had been an “intentional release” has had a change of mind and says there was no disease!
Who is David Martin PhD?
For those who may not know who Dr Martin is. Dr. David Martin has been speaking about the origins of SARS since 2006, and has been able to give a historical timeline leading up to the alleged pandemic in 2020, and has been an integral voice for those seeking the truth about the plandemic who have tended to always find him knowledgeable and trustworthy.
As recently as May this year, Dr Martin was seen giving an address at the International Covid Summit 3 – Press Conference. During his presentation, where he argued that the COVID-19 pandemic, was a pre-meditated act of domestic terrorism which he stressed did not happen overnight.
In fact, it was “56 years in the making”, he claimed and argued that a biological weapons lab facility at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill received an exemption from the gain-of-function moratorium so that by 2016, with a journal article saying “SARS coronavirus is poised for human emergence – in 2016.”
This, claimed Dr Martin “was WIV-1., the Wuhan Institute of Virology Virus One“, which was “Poised for human emergence in 2016 at the proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences” and he continued, “that by 2017 and 2018, the following phrase entered into common parlance among the community,”
“There is going to be an accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen. […]The operative word, obviously, in that phrase is the word “release.” Does that sound like a leak? Dr. Martin asks
“And, lo and behold, we got SARS-CoV-2 and four times in April of 2019 – seven months before the allegation of patient number one – four patent applications of Moderna were modified to include the term “accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen” Below is a slide from Dr. Martins presentation.
There Was No SARS Cov2 Disease, Just A Set of Symptoms and a Branding Campaign – Dr David Martin
Consider this: our worldwide fatality count attributed to the virus has exceeded Hitler in the Holocaust in half the time. As early as October 2020, even the CDC began to promote the idea that only six percent of the fatalities in the United States were exclusively COVID-19, reducing the exposure for liability. If we take the virus off the table, there is no more physical weapon to attribute to, for instance, 31 Black Pentecostal bishops who had been infected and died before the first Easter in the pandemic declaration, a case now on appeal at the Virginia State Supreme Court to convene a grand jury investigation.
Even seven deaths of thoroughbred race horses before the 149th running of the Kentucky Derby at Churchill Downs caused an investigation. And two bookend studies on the first variant found a secondary attack rate of less than five percent, the acceptance rate at Harvard, or your chance of winning a 35 to 1 payout on a two number combination in American roulette. With those odds, that virus killing 31 faith leaders is a long shot, but to suggest they happened to die stretches credulity.
We have a pastor in Alexandria, another case trying to obtain a grand jury, with force of law, and the pastor is convinced his symptoms caused him to lose ten pounds, while two teenage boys in his church were hospitalized and on respirators for the first Mother's Day in pandemic.
I'm just a former biological warfare who had been offered a job as a procurement analyst before the pandemic, a case at the Supreme Court and at the MSPB. Is it possible I received a job offer for a Top Secret billet, in an officially disavowed "expired" mission, without even applying for the job because there was no virus?