Career with a conscience?
In Harvard College, Vivek was member of Phi Beta Kappa: it’s like a pre-mason organization without the satanic passage rituals (just as Rotary or Lion’s Club).
Intern for mason company Goldman Sachs.
https://www.pdsoros.org/meet-the-fellows/vivek-ramaswamy
In 2011, the Paul & Daisy Soros Fellowships for New Americans awarded Ramaswamy a post-graduate fellowship.1
“As fund manager, invested in Martin Shkreli's company Retrophin, which bought drug patents/licenses for rare diseases, just to rise the price: “Thiola being marked up about 20x, from $1.50 to $30 per pill (patients must take 10 to 15 pills a day) and Chenodal 5x.” Shkreli was condemned for fraud (7 years in prison) and $72 million in fines. In a 2023 speech and in his book Woke Inc., Ramaswamy called Shkreli both "brilliant" and a pathological liar, but criticized the U.S. Department of Justice for prosecuting him, calling Shkreli's fraud “victimless”, in spite of not paying debts for over 10 million dollars (Lehman, Merrill Lynch2).”3
Vivek made dozens of millions, yet investors and pension funds lost 3 billion from his self-promoted Axovant company, which didn’t deliver a single drug to the market, in spite of his grandiose promises.
Vivek made SoftBank lose 1 billion in his company ROIvant, which never became profitable. Is he an entrepreneur or a legal conman? Why did he study law after biology?: he failed in business, but was able to make near 1 billion milked from institutional investors or masonic fund-managers under orders, who lost at least 4 billion. Bad, but “not bad” (for him). What kind of magician is this? for every 4 bucks, 3 disappear but 1 appears in his pocket. 100% unethical but 100% legal in the USA. Yet, the dollars belonged to real people, like the California State Teachers' Retirement System pension fund.
“An entrepreneur is the one who always searches for change, responds to it and exploits it as an opportunity”. That definition is immoral. Innovation is not equal to entrepreneurship. Would we call a drug-cartel gangster an entrepreneur because he came up with a submarine to smuggle drugs to the USA? Innovation is not equal to entrepreneurship.
Schumpeter advocated for creative-destruction in Capitalism as a positive result because the recombination of factors of production achieved a higher productivity/profit than in the previous stage, benefiting the common good. It is unethical to have profits by exploiting any stake-holder in the new venture, even if it is an investor (especially, if using the worker’s money through funds) or a consumer (especially, the very-sick).
Would Vivek call a haccine-developer an entrepreneur, in spite of making millions out of millions of lives lost, by being protected by legal immunity? Would he be a hypocrite if he didn’t? Some argue that he had no scruples on making billions by:
1. Extorting rare-disease patients by taking advantage of an unfair legal monopolistic protection granted by masonic patent laws which allow the “pay the overprice or die”.
2. Fleecing the investors by being smart to create legal traps to enrich himself in spite of (or because of) everyone else’s misery. In any venture, there’s a risk of failure, but it’s unethical that the entrepreneur walks away filthy rich in spite of it.
Vivek’s values
He served on the Ohio COVID-19 Response Team, which promoted hackswabbing, lockdowns, masks, haccines, etc. Vivek paid a wikipedia editor to remove this and his Soros connection.4
Despite his anti-woke sweet-talking, in 2020, he promoted “health equity and diversity within the biopharma and biotech industries”, through Roivant Social Ventures.5 Health equity “arises from access to the social determinants of health, specifically from wealth, power and prestige”6 and is “the state in which everyone has a fair and just opportunity to attain their highest level of health”7: in 2 words, health socialism (white communism).
“Diversity” means another woke ideology: gender ideology (pink and rainbow communism).
He’s not fully pro-life, i.e. from conception to natural death: “He supports state-level six-week abortion bans, with exceptions for rape, incest, and danger to the woman's life, but opposes a federal ban.”8
The latter is a tricky catch-phrase: in case of danger to a woman’s life no one is against trying to save both lives, it’s not procured abortion and therefore, not criminalized anywhere in the world.
In the case of rape, why does the innocent child (with 50% of the mothers’ genes) has to be another victim and condemned to death, instead of punishing the rapist? Why not adoption?
The case for incest means being in favor of eugenics by assuming higher chances of disabilities due to in-breeding. Precisely, this utilitarian and Darwinian mindset is behind the massive (95%) global extermination plan, dearly held by the secret global government, clearly proven by the weaponization of medicine and pharma since 1910.
He wrote an op-ed in the Boston Globe about Human-Chimeras: "One should treat a recipient of transferred humanity with the same level of respect as an organism with inborn humanity".
He believes the anti-science ideologies that burning fossil fuels causes global warming and in “climate change mitigation” (green communism).
“He supports the #Modi govt, and Hindu supremacist organizations. How can he ask for Christian votes while enabling the slaughter of Christians in India?”
WEF: it’s complicated !
Vivek was mentioned as a Young Global Leader in many pages of the masonic World Economic Forum. After years, he “sued” them for including him in the precious list, and twitted this WEF answer: 9
Why is it fake?
1. The logo is not the one of the WEF: the font is different and it lacks the semi-circle
2. It’s not even folded. It doesn’t have any marks of handling. It was not mailed: just printed in his office?
3. It has no legal value: no date, no signature, no contact information.
Compare with this real letter from the WEF (which proves it controls governments!):
Finally, it doesn’t say that he didn’t belong to the Young Global Leaders program: it only says that he was promoted without his consent after a certain date (not before, when they did have his consent?).
13 reasons why … NOT Vivek 10
1. Vivek Criticism on Trump re J6: “What Trump did last week was wrong. Downright abhorrent. Plain and simple. I’ve said it before and did so in my piece.” 11
2. Vivek Criticism on Trump re J6: “Both are terrifying. Unfortunately Trump’s egregious behavior last week blinds us from seeing that Big Tech’s cure is worse. Makes for a winning game for China in the long run.” 12
3. Vivek Praised Snapchat for Banning Trump 13
4. Vivek was a Soros Fellow 14
5. Vivek praised George Soros “Well said George Soros I consider Mr. Xi the most dangerous enemy of open societies in the world.” 15
6. Vivek says All Americans are responsible for J6 16
7. Viveks Company Roivant highlighted by Soros Fellowship & Vivek as a very friendly Tweet 17
8. Vivek Company Roivant Linked to the CCP In 2018, Vivek's company Roivant partnered with a Chinese asset management company to back a Chinese company named Sinovant. Sinovant then formed a partnership with a CCP-linked non-profit managed by the CCP's Ministry of Civil Affairs of China. 18
9. Was Roivant involved in creating the Covid-19 vaccine? Roivant Sciences’ Genevant Sciences and Arbutus are suing Pfizer with a lawsuit alleging that Pfizer infringed on their lipid nanoparticle technology to create the Covid-19 vaccine Comirnaty. 19
10. In 2020, Vivek said mask wearing is a personal responsibility & was very condescending to conservatives. “Wearing a mask = personal responsibility. It’s puzzling when conservatives oppose it. But before deriding them, remember this: CDC and WHO discouraged wearing masks in March - a “noble lie” to save masks for healthcare workers. Institutional lying erodes public trust in science.” 20
11. Vivek owns a BLACKROCK aggressive growth portfolio for his child worth up to $250,000. Vivek's "Ramaswamy Trust" owns up to 5 million dollars of a BLACKROCK Equity Fund. 21
12. In 2021, Vivek said "we should aim to safely vaccinate everyone who is eligible." Does Roivant have a deal with Pfizer? 22
13. Vivek called on other candidates to Pardon Trump (as if he was guilty of anything). 23
Vivek for Trump?
Vivek even legally supported Trump against his J6 indictment, but just as DeSantis24, still says the elections were not stolen and that J6 was a real insurrection:
“I just filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Justice following its failure to substantively respond to my Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to uncover what White House officials including President Joe Biden communicated to Merrick Garland & Jack Smith about the unprecedented indictment in the classified documents case of a former U.S. President and one of Biden's political opponents in the 2024 Presidential election. I’m also filing a separate FOIA request with the DOJ to uncover any similar communications relating to the just-issued Jan 6 Trump indictment. We should demand accountability and transparency.
In U.S. v. Alvarez, the Supreme Court held that political candidates have a First Amendment right to knowingly make inaccurate statements. If you're going to indict a former president and leading presidential candidate, it better not be based on unprecedented legal theory. Further, it's more than a stretch to call something criminal if someone is seeking legal counsel from their own lawyers.
Jack Smith has created a dangerous precedent by criminalizing the behavior of Trump's lawyers who offered him legal advice, labeling them co-conspirators instead. This jeopardizes the future of our legal system. If we fail to admit the truth, Jan 6 will just be a preview of far worse to come. We must reunite this country, but the path forward will not be easy.” 25
Why did he say that last part? “Donald Trump isn’t the cause of what happened on Jan 6. The real cause was systematic & pervasive censorship of citizens in the year leading up to it. If you tell people they can’t speak, that’s when they scream. If you tell people they can’t scream, that’s when they tear things down.” 26
What censorship is he talking about? The COVID gain of function at Wuhan paid by US taxpayers? The 30+ cures for COVID? The injuring lockdowns? The haccines? The stolen elections? No! Vivek only blamed how the FBI and Big Tech colluded to censor the Hunter Biden laptop story. 27
Out of the 6 co-conspirators, why did Vivek only defend the attorneys and not the rest who were also innocent? 28
Go paid at the $5 a month level, and we will send you both the PDF and e-Pub versions of “Government” - The Biggest Scam in History… Exposed! and a coupon code for 10% off anything in the Government-Scam.com/Store.
Go paid at the $50 a year level, and we will send you a free paperback edition of Etienne’s book “Government” - The Biggest Scam in History… Exposed! AND a 64GB Liberator flash drive if you live in the US. If you are international, we will give you a $10 credit towards shipping if you agree to pay the remainder.
Support us at the $250 Founding Member Level and get a signed high-resolution hardcover of “Government” + Liberator flash drive + Larken Rose’s The Most Dangerous Superstition + Art of Liberty Foundation Stickers delivered anywhere in the world. Our only option for signed copies besides catching Etienne @ an event.