Pfizer moves in TX v Pfizer
Files Notice of Removal to Federal Court
I previously wrote about AG Paxton’s law suit against Pfizer for deceptive marketing and I criticized his interpretation of the EUA Countermeasures law with regard to the covid-19 injections. EUAs are non-investigational poisons, and cannot be FDA approved in conformance with FD&C Act provisions while the PREP Act declaration for them remains active (covid PREP Act declaration is currently active until December 31, 2024 but expected to last until the end of times). Real FDA drug approval is predicated on the chemical entity being investigational and subject to IND regulations of clinical investigation, and all other pharmaceutical regulations covering manufacturing, distribution and marketing.
EUA countermeasures are, by law, NOT investigational: they exist only during the relevant public health emergency announcement (PREP Act declaration) and are exempt from all pharmaceutical regulations that apply to normal drugs. AG Paxton did not make that distinction clear in his complaint, albeit he accurately described other aspects of the EUA law. His interpretation of EUA countermeasure status of the covid shots is a bit vague, implying that they are normally FDA approved, but with some corners that were cut in a hurry.
As I expected, Pfizer is using their EUA countermeasure status and PREP Act coverage among other arguments asking to move this case to the federal court.
Pfizer’s Notice of Removal full document
They need to move this case to a federal court, because that’s the court controlled by the criminal cartel masquerading as the US Government, and in that court they have absolutely nothing to worry about. When criminals investigate themselves, and find themselves guilty, they pat themselves on the back for the job well done and pay themselves a bonus.
Predictably (and IMO, correctly) claiming “we did what US Government told us to do”:
Claiming “multiple colorable federal defenses”:
…including something called “political question doctrine” and “derivative sovereign immunity” (addressed further in this article).
First, as I have written many times before, Poison-19 is not an FDA approved vaccine (not legally anyway) but a covered EUA countermeasure:
Based on the EUA status, Pfizer points to the PREP Act that shields them from liability, and further pre-empts any state enforcement action:
Pfizer goes on discussing how their contract with US Government falls under the Defense Production Act authority - yes, this is also correct.
They further discuss how Food Drugs and Cosmetics Act (FDCA) can only be interpreted by the FDA and if FDA says something it’s law. That’s of course an absurdity as FDA is not a legislative body, but an administrator, subject to law. However the administrative state that is running this crime wants you to think the opposite - that their high priests and their pronouncements are above the law.
THANK YOU! to Everyone Who Contributed to our 1st Ever Fundraiser for the Art of Liberty Foundation! As of January 2nd we have raised $34,568 or 69% of our $50,000 goal! Donations are still coming in via postal mail and the internet so we will announce the final total next week BUT I wanted to thank everyone who contributed and/or went “Paid” on Substack. We simply couldn’t do this work without the folks who support us financially! It is so very much appreciated!! Happy New Year to All!! - Etienne
