Pentagon's Operation Prosperity Guardian "Falls Apart" As Spain, Italy, France Reject Request
Australia is the latest country to reject a request from the United States to send warships to the Red Sea under the command of the Pentagon's Operation Prosperity Guardian to protect commercial vesse
Australia is the latest country to reject a request from the United States to send warships to the Red Sea under the command of the Pentagon's Operation Prosperity Guardian to protect commercial vessels along the critical maritime trade route from Iran-backed Houthi.
Defense Minister Richard Marles told Sky News that Australia's military would not send a "ship or a plane" to the Red Sea but would triple the number of troops for the US-led maritime force.
"We need to be really clear around our strategic focus and our strategic focus is our region," Marles said.
The Pentagon's formation of Operation Prosperity Guardian, a new task force to protect shipping from Houthi drone and missile attacks in the Bab Al-Mandeb Strait and the Red Sea, requires increased warship patrols by the US and allies. This will create a security umbrella over commercial vessels to defend from attacks.
Reuters said about twenty countries have signed up for the Pentagon's new operation. However, several countries, including Australia, Spain, Italy, and France, have rejected the Pentagon's request to participate in the operation.
Spain's Defence Ministry said it would only participate in NATO-led missions or European-coordinated operations - not ones commanded by the Pentagon:
"We will not participate unilaterally in the Red Sea operation."
Italy's Defence Ministry voiced similar concerns, indicating it would send naval frigate Virginio Fasan to the Red Sea but only respond to requests by Italian shipowners.
"Operation Prosperity Guardian in the Red Sea has practically Collapsed as France, Spain, and Italy have all announced their Withdrawal from the US Command Structure for the Operation, with the Three Nations stating they will only conduct further Maritime Operations under the Command of NATO and/or the European Union and not the United States," X account OSINTdefender wrote.
We reminded readers of Zoltan Poszar's prediction of central-bank-analogized 'military protection' and said it's soon to become a reality... and just like that, it has:
Protection is a conceptual counterpart to par. When you decide to take money out of a sight deposit, you expect the same amount back that you put in (par).
When you sail foreign cargo from port A to port B, you expect to unload the same amount of cargo that you onloaded.
Banks can deliver par on deposits most of the time. When not, central banks step in to help.
Commodity traders can deliver foreign cargo from port A to port B most of the time, but when not, the state intervenes again: not the monetary arm, but the military arm of the state.
What central banks are to the protection of par promises, the military branch is to the protection of shipments: foreign cargo needs to sail on sea routes and through choke points like the Strait of Hormuz, and "par" in this context
As of Saturday morning, the number of container ships in the Red Sea with destinations to Asia, Europe, and the US is less than five.
Click the image above OR click HERE to download our annual report in PDF.
We are in the first major fundraising campaign in our history. We have raised $3168 from 33 donors with a goal to raise $50,000 from 150 donors by December 31st. The true number is higher because many people have supported us by “Going Paid” on Substack, which we appreciate and encourage! If you value having an articulate voice for voluntaryism, will you please consider making a donation today by “Going Paid” OR ArtOfLiberty.org/Sponsor? - Etienne de la Boetie2
The us as a power hungry war machine and not the defender of the republic is finally being realized by our allies. GOOD FOR THEM.
Iranian backed Houthis are precisely targeting Israeli/Zionist-owned vessels.
Why should any country other than Israel itself and the USA, (having a self-declared Zionist leader) engage in protecting those units and spend tax-payer's money that is badly needed for their own populace ??
Any other reason publicly-pronounced is utter bollocks but absolutely politically correct🤣🤣🤣.