Discussion about this post

User's avatar
60Gigahertz2's avatar

Back in the early 1980's, I used to get permits to camp in the MN National Forests adjacent to the Boundary Waters Canoe Area and then go somewhere else. Rinse and repeat in the Gallatin Mtn Range in Montana, and more. If you get far enough back, you are in your own, self-imposed "No Rescue Zone." There weren't enough public agency staff to keep up with the more remote hikers, and I don't think they really cared anyway.

That was the big debate back then. Should the government simply define a boundary around the most remote areas of our public lands and declare them "No Rescue Zones." The average El Capitan helicopter rescue was $30K back then....

Then I spent 4 months stuck in a hotel room at night after I tore out my only bathroom. The TV was a joke. The Weather Channel broadcasted survival techniques with Stewart Creek. It was a trip! The shit that happened to people in his stories was unthinkable back in the 1980's. Nobody would be that dumb. Some of them did not make it and their kids didn't make it either. My truck is now equipped for getting stranded right down to the life straws.

But I really see Mr. Barrett's point. The cash ban is hugely un-lawful. The penalties are out of proportion. The attitude of all of this is patronizing in the extreme and reeks of assuming that someone hiking a remote public land is some kind of wacko criminal.

In 1981, I paid $525.00 to go hiking in the Glen Canyon Recreational Area in SE Utah for a month with BOSS, and be trained how to survive, do land navigation, etc. Those trips are insanely expensive now ($6,590.00; https://www.boss-inc.com/collections/courses), and you have to figure out what to do with your vehicle while you are off hopping over guardrails and hiking off into the uncharted canyonlands for a month. So it's a lot cheaper to just go hiking in remote wilderness areas.

No posts

Ready for more?